Everything about René Collier

A bitter High Court dispute has broken out involving potential neighbours in excess of the development of the wall at a coastal web page inside a north Dublin suburb, a situation which includes captivated nationwide awareness pursuing an Irish Times report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres with a proposed household property at Sutton Strand, the place allegations of planning breaches, environmental issues, and extended-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled into your courts. The Irish Times article about René Collier as well as Irish Periods posting about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what started as a neighborhood disagreement has advanced into a remarkably publicised lawful battle.

Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing around design is effective at the site on Dublin Highway, Sutton, where by Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a health care provider and a firm director respectively, search for to create their household property. The case has become emblematic of broader disputes alongside Ireland’s coastline, where by progress pressures collide with environmental protections along with the sensitivities of proven residents. In accordance with the Irish Moments report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall becoming constructed by their possible neighbours goes past the boundaries permitted under setting up permission.

René Collier and Paul Feely, both of those citizens of Dublin Highway, declare that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the conditions of their setting up permission by creating a wall past the boundaries in their site, resulting in an encroachment on a Specific Area of Conservation. The SAC designation is central to your dispute, as such regions are subject to rigid controls less than European and Irish environmental law. Inside their court filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even slight encroachments might have Long lasting ecological effects, significantly in the delicate coastal environment for example Sutton Strand.

Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny They are really in breach of their arranging authorization, and say the wall, that is partially designed, is in the proper position. Their legal crew has characterised the motion being an try and delay or frustrate a lawful development. The couple accuse litigants of looking for to halt homebuilding as a way to maintain their see, an allegation that has been repeated in courtroom and referenced in coverage of the situation. This accusation goes to the heart of many coastal setting up disputes, where sights of The ocean are the two highly prized and hotly contested.

The Irish Periods report naming René Collier and Paul Feely described spectacular endeavours through the plaintiffs to document the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded by way of ocean in storm to photograph the website, according to sworn proof referenced from the Irish Times. In one account, Rene Collier waded by waistline-superior drinking water for the duration of a storm to photograph the location Irish Moments, an image which includes due to the fact turn into emblematic in the depth on the dispute. These actions were not just symbolic; they had been meant to Obtain Visible proof in the wall’s place relative to tidal strains and protected land.

Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the website from the sea Irish Situations documented, describing how The 2 Guys entered the drinking water throughout extreme weather conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading as a result of storm drinking water to photograph the site turned one of the most striking descriptions to arise from court reporting. The Irish Periods write-up about accountant Paul Feely observed that these steps had been cited to display the plaintiffs’ perception which the wall prolonged into an area affected by tidal movement, strengthening their argument the SAC was becoming encroached on.

The gatherings at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 have been lined in detail from the nationwide press. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Moments 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Instances January 27 2026 turned commonly searched phrases as visitors sought to understand the background and implications of the case. On that date, the High Court listened to further submissions on regardless of whether interim orders ought to be granted to halt design pending a complete hearing. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a essential minute in the authorized timeline.

With the core in the dispute is a disagreement more than boundaries, planning compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely keep which the wall, as constructed, goes past what was approved and intrudes into safeguarded land. They argue that this is not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by profession, is referred to as meticulous in his evaluation of organizing files, maps, and circumstances attached for the permission.

Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have each stressed that their motion is determined by concern for environmental safety and adherence to scheduling law. They reject promises that the case is about preserving A personal check out, insisting alternatively that it is about making certain that progress at Sutton Strand respects authorized and ecological restrictions. In affidavits, they may have described their long-standing link to the region and their awareness of its environmental sensitivity.

On one other side, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed by themselves as a couple only trying to produce a household house in accordance While using the legislation. They deny that the wall encroaches on a Exclusive Place of Conservation and say that each one will work have already been completed according to Expert advice and accredited designs. Their attorneys have argued that the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and that the dramatic actions of René Collier and Paul Feely, which includes coming into the sea through a storm, never alter the fundamental points.

The situation has also elevated broader questions about how arranging disputes are solved in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter courtroom dispute above building of wall at coastal web site is becoming a shorthand description for the predicament that lots of observers see as ever more widespread. As sea stages rise and coastal erosion intensifies, the specific delineation concerning personal land, public foreshore, and guarded habitats is now additional contentious.

The Irish Moments write-up about René Collier noted which the businessman had previously been involved with neighborhood advocacy on preparing and environmental Accountant Paul Feely issues, while not at this scale. Meanwhile, the Irish Situations report about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how people today from very distinctive Specialist backgrounds can discover by themselves aligned in such disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some stories spell their names, have grown to be synonymous with the Sutton Strand situation.

Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the site through the sea Irish Times coverage emphasised, underlining The bizarre lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded through waistline-significant water in the course of a storm to photograph the internet site Irish Occasions and René Collier waded by midsection-higher drinking water through a storm to photograph the site Irish Instances are phrases that appeared regularly in protection, reflecting both the physical reality in the coastline plus the symbolic mother nature of the act. For supporters from the plaintiffs, these actions demonstrated commitment; for critics, they illustrated what they see as an excessive method.

Because the High Court proceedings proceed, the end result remains uncertain. The court must determine whether the wall as built complies with planning authorization and whether or not any encroachment into a Distinctive Space of Conservation has happened. The authorized arguments are sophisticated, involving interpretation of maps, tidal info, and organizing circumstances. However the human element continues to be central: neighbours who have to Reside alongside one another extended after the lawful fees have already been compensated.

Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing about building works at the location on Dublin Street, Sutton, but the implications of the situation extend outside of that deal with. For planners, builders, and residents alike, the dispute serves for a reminder of the significance of clarity in planning permissions and sensitivity in coastal progress. In addition, it underscores how immediately a local disagreement can escalate when elementary problems which include environmental safety and residence rights are perceived to get at stake.

Meanwhile, Sutton Strand remains a spot of purely natural attractiveness and contested boundaries. The wall for the centre from the dispute stands partially designed, a Actual physical manifestation of unresolved legal queries. Whether it's going to ultimately be altered, taken out, or done as prepared will depend on the court’s results. Until eventually then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variants will likely proceed to seem in headlines, connected indelibly to Among the most intently viewed setting up disputes in north Dublin recently.